Book controversy reveals gaps in NCERT process

The recent uproar concerning the withdrawn Class 8 social science textbook, which included a chapter addressing judicial corruption, has brought to light significant flaws in the National Council of Educational Research and Training's (NCERT) three-stage book approval process. This procedure is intended to ensure that educational materials comply with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Critics argue that the incident underscores the need for a more robust mechanism to evaluate and vet educational content before it reaches students. The NCERT's inability to anticipate the backlash surrounding sensitive topics like corruption indicates a gap in its editorial judgment and review system. As the controversy unfolds, stakeholders in the education sector are calling for reforms to enhance transparency and accountability in the curriculum development process. This situation not only raises questions about the content selection criteria but also emphasizes the importance of addressing contemporary issues within the educational framework. With educational reforms being a priority under NEP 2020, it is crucial for NCERT to reassess its protocols to prevent similar controversies in the future.