SC bins five 'frivolous' PILs filed by a lawyer, asks if he 'drafted them at midnight'

The Supreme Court of India has dismissed five public interest litigations (PILs) deemed 'frivolous' and lacking substantive merit, filed by a lawyer known for repeatedly approaching the court. In a recent hearing, the bench expressed skepticism about the seriousness of the cases, humorously questioning whether the lawyer had drafted them 'at midnight'. The court emphasized the need for PILs to serve genuine public interest rather than being used as a tool for personal gain or frivolous litigation. This ruling underscores the judiciary's ongoing efforts to discourage misuse of the PIL mechanism, which is intended to address significant societal issues and promote justice. The Supreme Court's decision reflects a growing concern regarding the increasing number of baseless PILs that burden the judicial system and divert resources away from legitimate cases. Legal experts have welcomed the judgment as a necessary step in maintaining the integrity of the PIL process and ensuring that the courts remain accessible for serious grievances.